PL EN
THE EFFECT OF AGROTECHNICAL FACTORS ON THE POTASSIUM CONTENT AND ITS REMOVAL BY POTATO TUBERS
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Natural Science, Siedlce University of Natural Sciences and Humanities, Prusa St. 14, 08-110 Siedlce, Poland
 
2
Department of Environment Sciences, Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education, Sidorska St. 95/97, 21-500 Biala Podlaska, Poland
 
 
Publication date: 2015-09-09
 
 
J. Ecol. Eng. 2015; 16(4):180-184
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
A 3-year field experiment covered two methods of soil tillage, conventional and simplified, as well as the following herbicide options: Plateen 41,5 WG, Plateen 41,5 WG + Fusilade Forte 150 EC, Plateen 41,5 WG + Fusilade Forte 150 EC + adjuvant Atpolan 80 EC, Barox 460 SL, Barox 460 SL + Fusilade Forte 150 EC, Barox 460 SL + Fusilade Forte 150 EC + adjuvant Atpolan 80 EC and control object – mechanical weeding. Potassium content and its removal by potato tubers significantly depended on soil tillage methods, weed control methods and research years. More potassium was contained in tubers harvested from conventional tillage compared with the reduced tillage. Herbicides applied in the potato field significantly decreased potassium content in tubers compared with the control object. Simplifications of soil tillage decreased potassium accumulation in potato tubers compared with the conventional tillage. Significant changes were also observed in content of potassium and its removal by 1 tonne tubers between the experimental years.
 
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Barczak B., Nowak K. 2015. Effect of sulphur fertilisation on the content of macroelements and their ionic ratios in potato tubers. J. Elem., 20(1), 37–47. doi: 10.5601/jelem.2014.19.1.471.
 
2.
Boligłowa E., Dzienia S. 1999. Impact of foliar fertilisation of plant on the content of macroelements in potato. Electr. J. Polish Agric. Univ. Agronomy 2(2). Available online at http://www.ejpau.media.pl/volu....
 
3.
Burrowes J.D., Ramer N.J. 2008. Changes in the potassium content of different potato varieties after cooking. J. Ren. Nutr., 18(6), 530–534. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2008.08.005.
 
4.
Eremeev V., Lotildehmus A., Lääniste P., Jotildeudu J., Talgre L., Lauringson A. 2008. The influence of thermal shock and pre-sprouting of seed potatoes on formation of some yield structure elements. Acta Agric. Scand., Sec. B - Soil & Plant Science, 58, 35–42.
 
5.
Ezekiel R., Singh N., Sharma S., Kaur A. 2013. Beneficial phytochemicals in potato – a review. Food Res. Intern., 50, 487–496. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.025.
 
6.
Gugała M., Zarzecka K. 2011. Effect of insecticides on phosphorus and potassium content in tubers of three potato cultivars. J. Elem., 16(1), 43–50. doi: 10.5601/jelem.2011.16.1.43-50.
 
7.
Grześkiewicz H., Mazurczyk W. 2001. Uptake of potassium, nitrogen and magnesium by potato plants and their potassium and nitrogen nutrition depending of different nitrogen fertilization. Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 480, 403–413.
 
8.
Kabata-Pendias A. 2001. Trace elements in soils and plants. CRC Press Boca Raton, FL, USA, 413.
 
9.
Klikocka H. 2001. The influence of soil tillage systems and crop cultivation on content of macroelements in potato tubers. Biul. Inst. Hod. i Aklim. Roślin, 217, 197–203.
 
10.
Kolasa K.M. 1993. The potato and human nutrition. Am. Potato J., 70, 375–384.
 
11.
Leszczyński W. 2012. Nutrition value of potato and potato products. Biul. IHAR, 266, 5–20.
 
12.
Mazurczyk W., Lis B. 2001. Variation of chemical composition of tubers of potato table cultivars grown under deficit and excess of water. Pol. J. Food and Nutr. Sci., 2, 27–30.
 
13.
Miles G.P., Buchman J.L. 2009. Impact of zebra chip disease on the mineral content of potato tubers. Am. J. Potato Res., 86, 481–489. Doi: 10.1007/s12230-009-9104-0.
 
14.
Rivero R.C., Suarez P.S, Rodriguez E.M., Martin J.D., Romara C.D. 2003. Mineral concentrations in cultivars of potatoes. Food Chemistry, 83, 247–253.
 
15.
Tekalign T., Hammes P.S. 2005. Growth and productivity of potato as influenced by cultivar and reproductive growth II. Growth analysis, tuber yield and quality. Sci. Horticulturae, 1, 29–44.
 
16.
Wadas W., Jabłońska-Ceglarek R., Kurowska A. 2008. Effect of using covers in early crop potato culture on the content of phosphorus and magnesium in tubers. J. Elem. 13(2), 275–280.
 
17.
Wegener Ch.B., Jansen G., Jürgens H.U. 2015. Bioactive compounds in potatoes: Accumulation under drought stress conditions. Funct. Foods in Health and Disease, 5(3), 108–116.
 
18.
Westerman D.T., Sojka R.E.. 1996. Tillage and nitrogen placement effects on nutrient uptake by potato. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 60, 1448–1453.
 
19.
Wichrowska D., Wojdyła T., Rogozińska I. 2009. Concentrations of some macroelements in potato tubers stored at 4 °C and 8°C. J. Elem., 14(2), 373–382.
 
20.
Yildrim Z., Tokusoğlu Ő. 2005. Some analytical quality characteristic of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) minitubers (cv. NIF) developed via in vitro cultivation. Electr. J. Environ., Agric. and Food Chemistry, 4(3), 916–925.
 
21.
Zarzecka K., Gugała M. 2004. Phosphor and potassium contents in edible potato bulbs depending on the ways of weeds control. Horticult. and Veget. Growing, 23(3), 128–135.
 
22.
Zarzecka K., Gugała M., Mystkowska I., Zarzecka M. 2015. Chemical composition of edible potato tubers in retail outlets in east-central Poland. J. Ecol. Engin., 16(1), 57–61. doi: 10.12911/22998993/587.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top