APPLICATION OF CASSAVA PEELS ACTIVATED CARBON IN THE TREATMENT OF OIL REFINERY WASTEWATER – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Chemical Engineering, Delta State University, Oleh Campus, P.M.B. 22, Oleh, Nigeria
2
Department of Electrical/Electronic Engineering, Delta State University, Oleh Campus, P.M.B. 22, Oleh, Nigeria
3
Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, Federal University of Petroleum Resources, Mgbomro-Effurun, Nigeria
Publish date: 2016-04-01
 
J. Ecol. Eng. 2016; 17(2):52–58
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
A comparative analysis of the efficiency of activated carbon produced from fermented cassava peels (CPB), unfermented cassava peels (CPA) and commercial grade activated carbon (CAC) in the treatment of refinery wastewater was carried out. CPB was found to be 8% and 18% more efficient when compared to CPA and CAC in the removal of COD, and 14% and 3% better than CAC and CPA respectively in the removal of BOD5. The removal efficiency of Pb2+ by CPB was 100% compared to 95% and 57% by CPA and CAC while 96% of phenol was removed by CPB against 93% and 83% by CPA and CAC respectively. This better performance of CPB over CPA and CAC is not unconnected with its higher pH resulting from the removal of cyanide from the peels during the fermentation process. However, despite the high phenol removal efficiency by CPB, the concentration of phenol in the treated effluent does not meet the environmental guidelines for disposal. It is therefore, recommended that a two-stage CPB adsorption column arranged in series is necessary to treat refinery wastewater efficiently if it is desired to totally remove phenol from the effluent or reduce the concentration to 0.005mg/l allowed by the Federal environmental protection agency (FEPA). The equilibrium adsorption test conducted showed that the Freundlich isotherm is a better fit for the adsorption of phenol by the three activated carbons with correlation coefficients (R2) of 0.9364, 0.9383 and 0.9541 for CAC, CPA and CPB respectively. CPB was found to be a better adsorbent as it has the highest adsorptive capacity as evidenced from its better Freundlich exponent.
 
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Adeyinka J.S. and Rim-Rukeh A., 1999. Effect of hydrogen peroxide on industrial waste water effluent: A case study of Warri Refining and Petrochemical Company. Environs. Mont. Assess. 59, 249–256.
 
2.
Alinnor I.J. and Nwachukwu M.A. 2012. Adsorption of phenol on surface-modified cassava peel from its aqueous solution. International Journal of Environmental Science, Management and Engineering 1(2), 68–74.
 
3.
Awoyale A.A, Eloka-Eboka A.C. and Odubiyi A.O. 2012. Production and experimental efficiency of activated carbon from local waste bamboo for wastewater treatment. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 3(2), 8–10.
 
4.
Bhatnagar A. and Minocha A.K. 2009.Adsorptive removal of 2, 4-dichlorophenol from water utilizing Punica granatum peel waste and stabilization with cement. J. Hazard. Mat. 168, 1111–1113.
 
5.
Chukwuedo M.E. and Okieimen F.E. 2008. Enhanced metal adsorption by groundnut husks modified with citric acid, J. Chem. Soc. Nigeria, 33(2), .50–51.
 
6.
Eisler R. and Wiemeyer S.N. 2004. Cyanide hazards to plants and animals from gold mining and related water issues. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 183, 24–25.
 
7.
El-Naas M.H, Al-Zuhair S and Alhaji M. 2010. Reduction of COD in refinery wastewater through adsorption on date-pit activated carbon. J. Hazard. Mater. 173 (1-3), 750.
 
8.
FEPA, 1991. Environmental guidelines and standards for the petroleum industry in Nigeria. A publication of the Federal Environmental Protection Agency, Lagos-Nigeria.
 
9.
Fetter W.Jr., Scoey W.E. and Spangler F.L. 1982. Alum clarification of cations in refinery wastewater. Journal of Water Control Fed. 49, 742.
 
10.
Foo P.Y.I. and Lee L.Y. 2010. Preparation of activated carbon from parkia speciosa pod by chemical activation. In: Proceedings of World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science (WCEC 2010), San Francisco, U.S.A., vol. II, 98–99.
 
11.
Girish C.R. and Murty V.R. 2013. Adsorption of phenol from wastewater using locally available adsorbents. Journal of Environmental Research and development, 6(3A), 763–769.
 
12.
Hammed B.H. and Tan I.A.W. 2008. Adsorption isotherm, kinetic modeling and mechanism of 2, 4, 6-trichlorophenol on coconut husk-based activated carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 144, 235–237.
 
13.
Hariz I.B. and Monser L. 2014. Sulfide removal from petroleum refinery wastewater by adsorption on chemically modified activated carbon. International Water Technology Journal, 4(4), 264–267.
 
14.
Hussani A.H., Salehi S.B., Borghei M. and Siavashani B. 2011. Organic removal efficiency of the nanofiltration and adsorption hybrid system in high strength wastewater. Water and Waste 22(1), 42.
 
15.
Ilaboya I.R., Oti E.O., Ekoh G.O. and Umukoro L.O. 2013. Performance of activated carbon from cassava peels for the treatment of effluent wastewater. Iranica Journal of Energy and Environment 4(4), 361–370.
 
16.
Low K.S., Lee C.K. and Loo A.C. 1995. Removal of metals from electroplating wastes, using banana pith. Bioresour. Technol., 51, 227–229.
 
17.
Nekoo S.H. and Shohreh F. 2013. Experimental study and adsorption modeling of COD reduction by activated carbon for wastewater treatment of oil refinery. Iran J. Chem. Chem. Eng., 32(3), 81–83.
 
18.
Oghenejoboh K.M., Abowei M.F.N. and Puyate Y.T. 2008. Sorption mechanism of Nigerian crude petroleum into soil medium. Pollution Research 27(1), 7–8.
 
19.
Oghenejoboh K.M. 2012. Effects of starch fermentation on the shelf-life of cassava starch based adhesive. British Biotechnology Journal 2(4), 257–259.
 
20.
Oghenejoboh K.M. 2015. Effects of cassava wastewater on the quality of receiving water body intended for fish farming. British Journal of Applied Science and Technology 6(2), 164–165.
 
21.
Olayinka A.S. 2013. Assessment of toxic potentials of cassava effluent on Clarias Ganepinus, International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research 3(3), 157.
 
22.
Oti E.E. 2002. Acute toxicity of cassava mill effluent to the African Catfish Fingerlings. Journal of Aquatic Science 17(1), 31.
 
23.
Pant D. and Adholeya A. 2007. Biological approaches for treatment of distillery wastewater: A review, Bioresour. Technol. 98(12), 2321.
 
24.
Rengaraj S., Moon S.H., Sivabalan R., Aranbindoo R. and Murugesan V. 2002. Agricultural soil waste for the removal of phenol from water and wastewater by palm seed coat activated carbon. J. Waste Management 22, 543–545.
 
25.
Saed K., Johari M., Noor M.M. and Yusuf B. 2005. Sugarcane bagasse as an adsorbent for dye removal. Journal of Industrial Pollution Control 21(1), 3.
 
26.
Sarka M. and Acharya K.P. 2006. Use of fly ash for the removal of phenol and its analogues from contaminated water. Waste Manage. 26, 559–561.
 
27.
Tandale J.P. and Shide N.H. 2008. Preparation of low cost adsorbent and its characterization. Poll. Res. 27(4), 635.
 
28.
Ton M.A., Purcell P.J. and Zhao Y. 2012. Oil refinery wastewater treatment using physicochemical. Fenton and photo-Fenton oxidation processes, J. Environ. Sci. Health 47(3), 435.