PL EN
 
PL EN
Bieżące wydanie
O czasopiśmie
Zespół Redakcyjny
Redakcja i Wydawca
Opłaty za publikacje
Open Access
vol. 17, 2, 2016
Statystyki
Pobierz cytowanie
ECOLOGICAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ISSUES OF IMPLEMENTING CARBON DIOXIDE SEQUESTRATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY IN RUSSIA
Alexey Cherepovitsyn 1
,
 
Alina Ilinova 1
 
 
 
Więcej
Ukryj
1
National Mineral Resources University (Mining University), Vasil’evsky Ostrov, 21 liniya 2, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 199106
 
 
Data publikacji: 01-04-2016
 
 
J. Ecol. Eng. 2016; 17(2):19-23
DOI: https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/62281
 
 
Artykuł (PDF)
Referencje (17)
 
SŁOWA KLUCZOWE
carbon dioxide
sequestration
carbon capture and storage
oil recovery
EOR-CO2 technology
oil and gas
Russia
 
STRESZCZENIE
The objective of this paper is to define the main approaches to the implementation of carbon dioxide sequestration technologies in the oil and gas industry in Russia, and also to identify ecological, economic and social issues of their usage. Promotion of the technology of carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration by means of capturing and injecting it into underground reservoirs is a promising mechanism of reducing carbon dioxide concentration. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies might be used to enhance oil recovery (EOR-CO2) and production by means of oil extraction and decreasing oil viscosity. Conceptual view of the potential of EOR-СО2 technologies within the context of oil and gas industry sustainable development are presented. Incentives of the CCS projects implementation are identified. On the basis of the conducted research a number of scientific research and practical areas of the CCS technology development are presented.
 
REFERENCJE (17)
1.
Beecy D., Kuuskraa V. 2004. Basin strategies for linking CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage of CO2 emissions. 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Vancouver, Canada.
Google Scholar
 
 
2.
Cherepovitsyn A. 2009. The strategy of innovational development of the Russian Northwestern oil and gas industry. Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Economic Sciences, St. Petersburg.
Google Scholar
 
 
3.
Cherepovitsyn A., Ilinsky A. 2011. Geological disposal of carbon dioxide and radioactive waste: A comparative assessment. Comparison of the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste in European Russia. International Atomic Energy Agency; Springer Dordrecht London Heidelberg New York, 513 p.
Google Scholar
 
 
4.
Cherepovitsyn A., Smirnova N., Ilinova A. 2013. On the storage of СО2 in geological formations: economic and social aspects. RISC: Resources, Information, Supply, Competition, 4, 171–174.
Google Scholar
 
 
5.
Energy strategy of Russian Federation to 2030. URL: http://www.energystrategy.ru/.
Google Scholar
 
 
6.
Energy technology prospects. Strategies and scenarios to 2050. International Energy Agency, 2011. URL: http://www.iea.org.
Google Scholar
 
 
7.
European Commission – Reference Document on Best Available Techniques (BREF) in Mineral Oil & Gas Refineries. Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC), 2013, 730 p. URL: http://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu....
Google Scholar
 
 
8.
Global CCS Institute – Strategic Analysis of the Global Status of Carbon Capture and Storage. Report 3: Russia. 2009, 35 p. URL: http://cdn.globalccsinstitute.....
Google Scholar
 
 
9.
Greenpeace – False Hope – Why Carbon Capture and Storage Won’t Save the Climate. Greenpeace International. 2008, 44 p. URL: http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/....
Google Scholar
 
 
10.
IEA – Energy Technology Perspectives. Scenarios and Strategies to 2050. OECD/IEA, Paris. 2010. 710 p. URL: http://www.iea.org/publication....
Google Scholar
 
 
11.
IPCC – Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Special report, New York. 2012. 1088 p. URL: http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special....
Google Scholar
 
 
12.
Naucler T., Campbell W., Ruijs J. 2008. Carbon Capture & Storage: Assessing the Economics. Report of McKinsey & Company. 53 p. URL: http://assets.wwf.ch/downloads....
Google Scholar
 
 
13.
Rubin E.S. et al. 2005. Comparative Assessments of Fossil Fuel Power Plants with CO2 Capture and Storage. 7th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies (GHGT-7), Т.1, Elsevier, 9 p. URL: http://repository.cmu.edu/cgi/....
Google Scholar
 
 
14.
Shapovalov A., Davydova A. 2012. The climatic unconscious. Kommersant news paper. No. 232 (5017). URL: http://www.kommersant.ru/doc/2....
Google Scholar
 
 
15.
Toth F.L., Miketa A. 2011. Costs of the Geological Disposal of Carbon Dioxide and Radioactive Waste. Springer, 215–262.
Google Scholar
 
 
16.
Van Egmond S., Hekkert M.P. 2012. Argument Map for Carbon Capture and Storage. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 12 p. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ij....
Google Scholar
 
 
17.
WWF – The Energy Report, 100% Renewable Energy by 2050. WWF/Ecofys/OMA, Gland, Switzerland. 2011. 256 p. URL: http://www.wwf.or.jp/activitie....
Google Scholar
 
 
Udostępnij
Wyślij mailem
ARTYKUŁ POWIĄZANY
Assessment of Exposure to Particulate and Microbiological Contaminants in a Lecture Room
Natural Biosorbent for Oil Adsorption from Produced Water by Sedge Cane
About the Optimal Ratio Inhibitor and Activators of Carbon Dioxide Sorption Process by Using Chlorophyll-Synthesizing Microalgae Chlorella
Improvement of Efficiency of Steam-Thermal Treatment of High-Viscous Oil Formations Using Downhole Electric Steam Generators
Effect of Fuel Combustion Products on Carbon Dioxide Uptake Dynamics of Chlorophyll Synthesizing Microalgae
Journals System - logo
© 2006-2024 Journal hosting platform by Bentus
Scroll to top