Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszow, Ćwiklińskiej 2, 35-959, Rzeszów, Poland
University of Central Lancashire, School of Forensic and Applied Sciences, Preston PR1 2HE, United Kingdom
Data publikacji: 09-11-2015
J. Ecol. Eng. 2015; 16(5):213-217
Distribution of Dendrobaena alpina covers the mountainous region of central Europe, where it has a high dominance and frequency index. This work describes data from field studies conducted over two annual cycles in the Bieszczady National Park (BNP), Poland, in different types of beech forest. Densities of this species ranged from 47–231 g·m-2 with associated biomasses of 19–90 g·m-2. Most (66%) were recovered from less than 0.1 m soil depth with a further 28% from up to 0.2 m. Further, the animals were collected alive from Lutowiska, close to the BNP to obtain baseline data on the life history of D. alpina. Mature individuals were kept in isolation and cocoon production monitored on a 2 monthly basis. Immature individuals were kept until they reached maturity, when they were paired, with combined output of cocoons regularly monitored. Cocoons were collected, had their masses determined and were incubated. Hatchability was recorded, as was estimated duration of incubation and growth to maturity. Field-collected adults had a mean mass of 1.4 g and at 15 ºC, these produced an average of 1.83 cocoons·worm-1·month-1. Zero cocoons were produced by further specimens, collected as immature, grown to maturity and maintained in isolation. Recently-matured, paired D. alpina produced an average of 1.65 cocoons·worm-1·month-1. Cocoons had a mean mass of 19 mg. At 15 ºC, cocoons produced by recently matured adults hatched after 80 days (82% viable), but after 2 months the majority of cocoons failed to hatch. Hatchling growth from an average of 18 mg to maturity required 7–11 months in the given substrate.
Blouin M., Hodson M.E., Delgado E.A., Baker G., Brussaard E., Butt K.R., Dai J., Dendooven L., Peres G., Tondoh J.E., Cluzeau D., Brun J.J. 2013. A review of earthworm impact on soil function and ecosystem services. European Journal of Soil Science, 64, 161–182.
Butt K.R., Grigoropoulou N. 2010. Basic Research Tools for Earthworm Ecology. Applied and Environmental Soil Science. 12, DOI:10.1155/2010/562816.
Csuzdi C., Pop A.A., Pop V.V., Wink M., Zicsi A. 2005. Revision of the Dendrobaena alpina (Rosa, 1884) species group (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) by morphological and molecular methods. In: V.V. Pop, A.A. Pop (Eds.), Advances in Earthworm Taxonomy II (Annelida: Oligochaeta). Cluj University Press, Cluj, 119–128.
Dumnicka E., Kostecka J. 2000. Review of Oligochaeta and Hirudinea of Bieszczady. Monografie Bieszczadzkie, 7, 15–28.
Kasprzak K. 1986. Soil Oligochaeta. III. Earthworm familly (Lumbricidae). Keys to determine invertebrates of Poland. PWN, Warszawa (in Polish).
Kostecka J, Skoczeń S. 1993. Earthworm (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) populations in four types of beech wood (Fagetum carpaticum) in the Bieszczady National Park (south-eastern Poland). Part 1. Species composition, diversity dominance, frequency and associations. Acta Zool Cracov. 36, 1–13.
Lowe C.N., Butt K.R. 2005. Culture techniques for soil dwelling earthworms: A review. Pedobiologia. 49, 401–413.
Pączka G., Mazur-Pączka A., Kostecka J. 2015. Soil fauna research in Poland: earthworms (Lumbricidae). Soil Science Annual, Vol. 66, No. 2, DOI: 10.1515/ssa-2015-0018.
Plisko J.D. 1971. Earthworms (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) of the Bieszczady Mountains. Fragmenta Faunistica, 17, 31–48.
Pop V.V., Pop A.A. 2004. A comprehensive study of the Taxonomy and ecology of the earthworm genus Octodrilus from the Carpathians. In: C.A. Edwards (Ed.), Earthworm Ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 115–141.
Pop V.V., Pop A.A., Csuzdi C. 2007. An updated viewpoint on the earthworm communities with the Dendrobaena alpina species group (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae) from the South-Eastern Carpathians. European Journal of Soil Biology, 43, 53–56.
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top