NUMBER AND ACTIVITY OF MICROORGANISMS IN SOIL INOCULATED WITH THE RHIZOCELL C BIOPREPARATION IN STRAWBERRY CULTIVATION (FRAGARIA × ANANASA DUCH.)
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Agrotechnical Systems Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Szczecin, Papieża Pawła VI 1, 71-459 Szczecin, Poland
2
Department of Horticulture, West Pomeranian University of Szczecin, Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland
3
Department of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, West Pomeranian University of Szczecin, Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland
4
Department of Agrotechnical Systems Engineering, West Pomeranian University of Szczecin, Słowackiego 17, 71-434 Szczecin, Poland
Publish date: 2016-04-01
 
J. Ecol. Eng. 2016; 17(2):135–140
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
An experiment involving vegetation pots was conducted to assess the effect of inoculating the soil with the Rhizocell C biopreparation, which includes bacteria from the genus Bacillus amyloliquefaciens IT45, on the number and activity of selected groups of soil microorganisms. The biopreparation was applied in strawberries (Fragaria × ananasa Duch.) in a dose recommended by the manufacturer. Microbiological analyses were conducted four times during the vegetation of plants. The obtained results led to a conclusion that the use of biopreparation affects biological activity of soil, and a majority of the observed changes were beneficial. The mean number of the most microorganisms after Rhizocell C biopreparation was higher than in the control object. Soil inoculation had an influence on the activity of microorganisms determined based on biomass content, but the differences were not significant.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Anderson J.P.E., Domsch K.H. 1978. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils. Soil. Biol. Biochem., 10, 215.
 
2.
Anerek B., Górska E.B., Russel S. 2006. Charakterystyka celulolitycznego szczepu Micromonospora rubra wyizolowanego z gleby. Acta Agr. Silv., Agraria, 49, 5–11.
 
3.
Barea J.M., Azcon R., Azcon-Aguilar C. 2002. Mycorrhizosphere interactions to improve plant fitness and soil quality. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek., 81(1-4), 343–351.
 
4.
Breza-Boruta B. 2002. Wybrane właściwości enzymatyczne promieniowców z rodzaju Streptomyces wyizolowanych spod uprawy ziemniaka. Acta Sci. Pol., Agricultura, 1(1), 27–36.
 
5.
Bunt J.S., Rovira A.D. 1955. Microbiological studies of some subantarctic soil. J. Soil Sci., 6 (1), 119–128.
 
6.
Burbianka M., Pliszka A. 1977. Mikrobiologia żywności. PZWL, Warszawa.
 
7.
Cavigelli M.A., Robertson G.P. 2000. The functional significance of denitrifier community composition in a terrestrial ecosystem. Ecology, 81, 1404–1414.
 
8.
Cooney D.G., Emerson R. 1964. Termofilic fungi. Freeman, London.
 
9.
Derkowska E., Sas Paszt L., Harbuzov A., Sumorok B. 2015. Rooth growth, mycorrhizal frequency and soil microorganisms in strawberry as affected by biopreparations. Adv. Microbiol., 5, 65–73.
 
10.
Fenglerowa W. 1965. Simple method for counting Azotobacter in soil samples. Acta Microbiol. Pol., 14, 203.
 
11.
Jarecki W., Bobrecka-Jamro D. 2012. Reaction of white lupine (Lupinus albus L.) to seed inoculation with nitragina. Acta. Sci. Pol, Agricultura, 11(2), 19–26.
 
12.
Kaczmarek Z., Wolna-Maruwka A., Jakubus M. 2008. Zmiany liczebności wybranych grup drobnoustrojów glebowych oraz aktywności enzymatycznej w glebie inokulowanej Efektywnymi Mikroorganizmami (EM). J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng., 53(3), 122–127. [in Polish.].
 
13.
Kędzia W., Konar H. 1974. Diagnostyka mikrobiologiczna. PZWL, Warszawa.
 
14.
Kowalska J., Sosnowska D., Remlein-Starosta D., Drożdżyński D., Wojciechowska R., Łopatka L. 2012. Efektywne Mikroorganizmy w rolnictwie ekologicznym. Ministerstwo rolnictwa i rozwoju wsi, Warszawa, Falenty.
 
15.
Küster E. 1971. Biologia gleby. PWRiL, Warszawa.
 
16.
Maliszewska W. 1954. Proponowana szczegółowa metodyka analiz mikrobiologicznych gleby. IUNG, Puławy.
 
17.
Martin J.P. 1950. Use of acid rose bengales and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi. Soil Sci., 69, 215–233.
 
18.
Martyniuk S. 2011. Skuteczne i nieskuteczne preparaty mikrobiologiczne stosowane w ochronie i uprawie roślin oraz rzetelne i nierzetelne metody ich oceny. Post. Mikrobiol., 50(4), 321–328.
 
19.
Martyniuk S. 2012. Czy rozwój integrowanej ochrony roślin I rolnictwa ekologicznego zwiększy wykorzystanie biopestycydów w praktyce rolniczej? J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng., 57(4), 35–37.
 
20.
Schimel J.P., Gulledge J. 1998. Microbial community structure and global trace gases. Global Change Biol., 4, 745–758.
 
21.
Vessey J.K. 2003. Plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil, 255, 571–586.
 
22.
Watanabe K. 2002. Linking genetics, physiology and ecology: an interdisciplinary approach for advancing bioremediation. J. Biosci. Bioeng., 94 (6), 557–565.
 
23.
Wielgosz E., Dziamba S., Dziamba J. 2010. Effect of application of EM spraying on the populations and activity of soil microorganisms occurring in the root zone of spring barley. Pol. J. Soil Sci., 43, 65–72.
 
24.
Wierzba S., Nabrdalik M. 2005. Biocomposite for organic waste degradation. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process., 39, 249–256.
 
25.
Winding A., Hund-Rinke K., Rutgers M. 2005. The use of microorganisms in ecological soil classification and assessment concept. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 62, 230–248.
 
26.
Wolna-Maruwka A., Schroeter-Zakrzewska A., Borowiak K. 2010. Wpływ preparatu EM na stan mikrobiologiczny podłoża przeznaczonego do uprawy pelargonii (Pelargonium × hortorum). Nauka Przyr. Technol., 4(6), #98.
 
27.
Wolna-Maruwka A., Schroeter-Zakrzewska A., Borowiak K., Niewiadomska A. 2012. Impact of microbiological inoculum on numbers and activity f microorganisms in peat substrate and on growth and flowering of Scarlet sage. Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 21(6), 1881–1891.
 
28.
Wyszkowska J., Kucharski J., Borowik A. 2013. Biological effects of L-tryptophan and the vaccine Azotobakteryna in soil. J. Res. Appl. Agric. Eng., 58(4), 238–241.
 
29.
Wyszkowska J., Kucharski M., Kucharski J. 2008. Microbiological and biochemical properties of soil depending on adenine and Azotobacterin applied. J. Elem., 13, 127–137.
 
30.
http://agriculture-de-conserva..., dostęp z dnia 22.06.2015.